Samsung Galaxy A56
TOP 10 MOST PROFITABLE SMARTPHONES | Q3-Q4 2025
Pros
- High-quality Super AMOLED screen with HDR10 Plus support
- Very high peak screen brightness (1900 nits)
- Efficient Exynos 1800 processor and fast UFS 3.1 storage
- Large 5000 mAh battery
- Attractive price and excellent value for users
Cons
- No significant drawbacks identified
“If you like Samsung and if you have the opportunity to spend around PLN 1600-1700, I unequivocally recommend the A56.”
BEST smartphones of the first half of 2025: 10 categories
Pros
- High screen quality
- Capacious 5000 mAh battery
- Support for 45W fast charging
- Great sales potential in Poland
Cons
- Lack of specific camera details
- Unspecified processor for the A56 model
The Samsung A56 is a smartphone distinguished by its very good screen and solid 5000 mAh battery with 45W fast charging. The device, available for 1400-2000 PLN, is seen as one of the sales leaders in the Polish market.
Despite the positive aspects, there is a lack of specific details about the camera, which hinders a full assessment of its photographic capabilities. Processor differences between the A36 and A56 models suggest varied performance, but the specific chip for the A56 is not clearly defined.
“In my opinion, these are the biggest sales potentials in Poland.”
Samsung Galaxy A36 vs Galaxy A56: Which one to get?
Pros
- Significantly better performance from the Exynos 1580 chipset.
- Superior main and ultrawide camera quality, especially in low light.
- Faster UFS 3.1 storage.
- Supports HDR10 Plus video playback on its bright OLED screen.
- Offers an aluminum frame for a more premium build.
Cons
- Battery life, while slightly ahead overall, is not universally superior to the A36 in all aspects, such as gaming.
- Macro and selfie camera performance is similar to the A36, not offering a clear upgrade in these specific areas.
“In the end, the Galaxy A56 could be worth it if the faster chipset performance and slight improvement in camera quality are important to you.”
Samsung Galaxy A56 vs Galaxy S24 FE: Which one to get?
Pros
- Camera: Delivers better low-light photos.
- Camera: Provides slightly sharper selfies.
- Camera: Includes a dedicated macro camera.
- Performance: Features much better thermal management.
- Value: Is a less expensive option.
Cons
- Camera: Lacks a 3x telephoto zoom lens.
- Camera: Video recording maxes out at 4K.
- Performance: Has lower CPU and graphics benchmark scores.
- Performance: Not ideal for heavy tasks or intense gaming.
- Screen: Offers slightly lower max brightness.
The Samsung Galaxy A56 stands out as a strong value-for-money smartphone, offering several advantages particularly in its camera system and thermal management. It provides better low-light photos and sharper selfies, along with a dedicated macro lens, enhancing its photographic capabilities.
While its mid-range Exynos 1580 chipset is suitable for daily needs, it is outperformed by the S24 FE in raw processing power and intensive gaming. However, the A56 compensates with superior thermal management, preventing overheating during prolonged use. Its most significant appeal remains its more affordable price point, making it an excellent choice for users looking to save money without compromising on key features.
“But the Galaxy A56 is the lighter phone. We preferred its selfies and low light photos, and it has a dedicated macro cam. And probably the biggest advantage is that this phone is less expensive.”
“Otherwise, better go for the A56 and save some cash.”
TOP 10 MOST COST-EFFECTIVE SMARTPHONES | Q2 2025
Pros
- Large 5000 mAh battery.
- Fast 45W charging.
- Solid Exynos 1580 processor.
- Very good 6.7-inch screen.
- Attractive price.
The Samsung Galaxy A56 is a very solid proposition for users looking for a Samsung smartphone in the segment up to 2000 PLN, costing around 1700-1800 PLN. It offers an impressive 5000 mAh battery with fast 45W charging, which sets it apart from the competition, even compared to more expensive models.
Equipped with a solid Exynos 1580 processor and up to 12 GB of RAM, it ensures smooth performance, and its very good 6.7-inch screen guarantees a comfortable user experience. Furthermore, the phone has a water resistance certificate and good build quality, being perceived as a cheaper alternative to the S24 FE.
“In fifth place is the Galaxy A56, the more expensive counterpart to the A36. [...] In the A56, we have a 5000 mAh battery, 45W charging, [...] Additionally, a solid Exynos 1580, 6 or 12 GB RAM, a 6.7-inch screen. Of course, a water resistance certificate, a very good screen, good build quality. Overall, it's like a cheaper version of the S24 FE. If someone is looking for a Samsung smartphone under two thousand [PLN], because it's around 1700-1800 PLN, in my opinion, it's worth it.”
Samsung Galaxy A56 vs Galaxy A55: Which one to get?
Pros
- Screen is slightly larger and brighter
- Performance shows clear improvement in benchmarks
- Excellent thermal management during stress tests
- Faster initial charging speed to 65%
- Main camera offers sharper nighttime video
Cons
- Less power efficient battery than predecessor
- Full charging time is unexpectedly slower
- Main camera can produce overly bright shadows
- Ultrawide nighttime photos are soft and noisy
- Overall value is questionable compared to the A55 at full price
The Samsung Galaxy A56 offers several minor upgrades over its predecessor, including a slightly larger and brighter OLED screen, a more powerful Exynos 1580 chipset with improved benchmark performance, and faster initial charging speeds. Its main camera also delivers sharper nighttime video footage.
The A56 also shows a reduction in battery power efficiency and an unexpectedly slower full charging time despite the upgraded wattage. While it presents some enhancements, the reviewer concludes that the overall user experience is nearly identical to the A55.
Therefore, unless the Galaxy A56 is available at a discount, the A55 might be a more sensible purchase for better value.
“The A56 is lighter with more durable glass on the back. It has a slightly larger and brighter screen. Its speakers sound better. Its chipset is more powerful, and it has longer software support.”
“Overall, even though the Galaxy A56 is slightly better, you get nearly the same experience with either phone.”