
The Apple iPhone Air stands out for its exceptionally light, thin, and beautiful design, which gives it an impossibly good feel in the hand. It is considered one of the most aesthetically impressive products of the year, winning a design award for its unique form factor.
However, these design achievements come with significant compromises, including a clearly worse battery and the presence of only a single camera. Despite its appealing aesthetics, the reviewer found these sacrifices made the phone impractical for daily use, ultimately determining they could not live with its limitations.
“It is clearly a worse battery and it's dropped all the way down to a single camera. But also what they've ended up with is a phone that feels crazy. It feels impossibly light. It looks impossibly thin.”
“It's just one of those phones that feels so good in the hand and is so impressive that like I want to be able to use it daily. Like I want to be the type of person who could live with these sacrifices. Uh I tried. I can't. Like I need this to have dual cameras and a silicon carbon battery and they didn't do that.”
The Apple iPhone Air presents itself as a compelling device, featuring a strong A19 Pro chip, a 120Hz always-on display, and an advanced front-facing camera. It also stands out with dual frequency GPS and a generous 256GB of base storage.
However, its single rear camera limits advanced photography options like macro or cinematic modes, and its MagSafe charging and USB-C data transfer speeds are not top-tier compared to the Pro models. Priced at $999, the reviewer notes its appeal lies more in its unique aesthetic and novelty rather than universal recommendation for specific user needs.
“And of course, the last one being the iPhone Air. This one's really hard to recommend to anybody as like you should buy that. That's the best one for you. But I think there's going to be people who buy it just because it's cool, just because it's novel, just like a thin little phone, kind of minimal in a way.”
The Apple iPhone Air is acknowledged for offering an optimal balance in device size and display within the iPhone lineup, appealing to a specific audience as a 'fantastic iPhone' for the right person. However, its primary appeal of thinness is lost when a case is applied, making its inherent compromises more pronounced.
The device faces significant criticism regarding its camera system, which lacks a wide-angle lens and proper optical zoom, relying instead on subpar digital zoom. Battery life is also notably inconsistent, performing adequately for daily routines but struggling severely during travel or heavy usage.
These limitations, coupled with its expensive price and the loss of its unique design with a case, led the reviewer to ultimately switch from the device. While it may suit certain users, it did not meet the reviewer's professional needs due to its unreliability in key areas.
“as soon as you add a case to the iPhone Air, it's not an iPhone Air anymore because it's thicker and you've lost all of the stuff that makes it so special and so unique and beautiful. That's gone. Which means the concessions you're making with the camera system and some of the battery stuff, which I'll come on to in a second, it doesn't seem worth it anymore.”
“The best way to describe the battery life in the iPhone Air is that it's very jackal and hide. [...] So, for me, it's just inconsistent and I can't live with that.”
The Apple iPhone Air, while presenting notable compromises, is described as an enjoyable and exciting device. It boasts a powerful A19 Pro chip and a unique display size, alongside a game-changing front-facing selfie camera.
However, its battery life is a significant weakness, and the main camera system lacks an ultrawide lens and offers poor digital zoom. Despite these trade-offs, the phone's fresh design and specific features make it highly appealing to a particular segment of experimental tech users and Apple fans who are willing to accept its limitations.
“If you're a bit experimental with your tech and you can look past or at least accept those compromises, because the battery is a compromise, the camera system is a compromise. The speaker might be a compromise depending on how you use your phone. If you can accept those compromises, I think you'll be very happy with this because it is fresh. It's new. It's exciting.”
“If you can accept those compromises, I think you'll be very happy with this because it is fresh. It's new. It's exciting. And and this is dangerous, I know, if you don't mind going caseless, you'll get even more from it in terms of the design.”
“There's just something about the iPhone Air, but you have to live with those compromises. And judging by the comments I've received so far about this phone from people who have switched to it, there's definitely a subsection of Apple fans out there for whom this is perfect because they are very, very happy.”
The Apple iPhone Air receives a strong non-recommendation due to its perceived poor value and significant drawbacks, with the reviewer labeling it a "gimmick" and "piece of shit" at its $1,087 price point. While it offers a beautiful bright display, a capable A19 chipset, a thin design, MagSafe, and iOS updates, these positives are overshadowed by critical flaws.
Major issues include the complete absence of a wide-angle camera, mediocre battery life that often requires an external pack, and overheating due to the lack of a vapor chamber cooling system which leads to throttling. The reviewer explicitly states that better options are available for just a slightly higher cost.
“Overall, would I recommend this phone? I would recommend it. Honestly, no.”
“because this is this is $1,200 down the drain for a gimmick.”
“On a scale of 1 to 10, this is a piece of [ __ ]. I don't like the design. I mean, the best thing about it that it got going for it that it's thin and light. You still got the A19, you know, little watered down version, you know, without the vapor chamber cooling. So, you're going to get some throttling. You still got a a nice chipset in this. You got a nice display. You got a nice basic camera. You got Mag Safe. You know, you're getting the iOS updates and all of that. The basic stuff.”
The Apple iPhone Air, priced at $999, is presented as a less compelling option compared to the $799 iPhone 17, despite sharing some premium features like a high-quality 120Hz ProMotion display, an excellent main camera, and 12GB of RAM for fast performance.
However, the Air makes significant compromises, including the absence of an ultrawide camera, lack of cinematic video mode, and notably worse battery life, consistently coming last in tests.
The reviewer also highlights its single speaker which delivers inferior audio quality compared to the iPhone 17's stereo setup. These drawbacks, combined with its higher price, position the iPhone Air as a less advisable choice for most users.
“And while I do genuinely love the iPhone Air, it's more expensive, $999 versus $799. You also only get a single camera rather than two cameras, single speaker, stereo speakers, and the battery doesn't last as long. So, for my money, this is the best new iPhone.”
The Apple iPhone Air stands out as an impressive engineering achievement, packing advanced hardware into a slim form factor without compromising battery life or thermal performance. It offers an excellent camera system, capable of great photos and 4K video in various conditions, and a high-quality 120Hz OLED screen with a useful anti-reflective coating.
Despite featuring a less powerful GPU than its Pro counterparts and slower USB 2.0 speeds, its CPU performance is strong, and thermal management is respectable. However, users should be aware of its unexciting charging speeds, the camera's limited versatility due to the lack of ultrawide or telephoto lenses, and notably, its poor speaker quality.
Overall, the iPhone Air is a good phone, particularly for those who prioritize a thin design and robust core features, even with a few compromises.
“So, there you have it, guys. The iPhone Air is an impressive feat of engineering. Apple was able to fit all that hardware and is such a slim form factor without wrecking the battery life or the thermals.”
“But otherwise, the iPhone Air is a good phone. And if you ever wish your iPhone was thinner, then this could be the right choice for you.”
“My main phone is the iPhone Air. I've switched to this from the iPhone 16. This is my main phone.”
“It's the new kid on the block. It's super thin. It's got the A19 Pro chip.”
“Yes, there are compromises with battery life and the camera system quite significantly on both counts”
The Apple iPhone Air delivers a premium smartphone experience, featuring the powerful A19 Processor and a stunning 6.5-inch OLED 120Hz ProMotion display within an exceptionally thin and light design.
This device is an appealing choice for those seeking high-end performance and build quality without the bulk of the Pro models.
While it makes some compromises, such as the absence of an ultrawide camera and slightly less battery life, its overall package is highly recommended. It represents a fresh alternative for users tired of the traditional iPhone Pro design.
“This is the iPhone Air. This crazy thin, stupidly thin. [...] exceptionally thin phone? That's obviously why it exists. The Air, right?”
“This is certainly a premium phone in terms of build, in terms of display, processor, and all that stuff, but there is room to grow. I would like to see them add ultra wide, for example. Stereo speakers would be nice,”
“overall, for those of you who are just tired of the carry of the Pros and you're looking just for something different after years of same with the iPhone design”
“I know it's $200 extra for a phone that is missing a lot of features from the regular iPhone 17, especially notably a second camera.”
“This is our thin one. Y'all can't even beat this.”
“Okay, it's the worst speaker I've heard on an iPhone in quite some time. [...] Physics, right? Like Apple has done a lot to bend the laws of physics in terms of making their very compact devices sound shockingly big, but there's only so much they can do.”
“The end result is an iPhone that is noticeably thinner and lighter than it's been in a long time. It is super impressive, and importantly, deserving of the Air name.”
“So the speakers are definitely not great, but they're acceptable for most everyday use. [...] that made it a deal breaker for me is the cameras and the battery.”
“if you are getting to year three or four of your phone and the battery is not an issue and you feel like you're a pretty light user, then the Air could be fine for you.”
The reviewer views the iPhone 17 Air as an average phone, though it possesses several distinguishing features. The device offers a larger, good-quality screen compared to the standard iPhone 17, and its battery surprisingly provides a mediocre yet acceptable performance.
However, the single camera lens is deemed insufficient compared to the dual-camera system in the standard model. The critic highlights that while the phone's initial slimness might be attractive, its appeal will likely fade after a few months of use, making the overall value of the iPhone 17 Air debatable.
“So it seems to me that this is a mediocre phone.”
“But in my opinion, after six months, when you take it out of the case [...] you'll say: Oh, it was thin, indeed. No, I'll buy the normal one next time.”
“What's mediocre about this phone is basically everything else, meaning that there's only one camera lens here.”
“it only takes until 7 hours 18 minutes for the air to die completely. That's a pretty early KO.”
“Apple said that this phone should have the same battery life as the iPhone 16 Pro. But that phone should last longer than the iPhone 16, which in itself is already leagues ahead of what the Air's just done.”
The Apple iPhone Air presents itself as an aesthetic and fashionable device, offering an interesting 6.5-inch display with 3000 nits brightness and the innovative 18 MP Central Stage camera.
However, its high price exceeding 5000 zł is questioned due to a number of compromises. The phone is equipped with a small 3100 mAh battery with slower charging, only a single mono speaker, and lacks a physical SIM card tray.
The reviewer points out that these shortcomings make the iPhone Air likely to lose out to competitors like the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge, and does not predict a major market success for it.
“and the Air model is very nice, an aesthetic fashion element that might sell to some extent. However, I absolutely do not believe it will be some huge hit.”
“everything else in terms of battery, charging speed, single lens, single speaker, lack of a physical SIM card tray slot. And these prices over 5000 zł do not argue for buying the Air.”
“In the iPhone world, the Air adds a dash of needed novelty to a lineup that was feeling pretty stale, at least to me.”
“And maybe more importantly, it doesn't make as many compromises as I expected it would.”
“The iPhone Air is a phone for the kind of person I once was and maybe still am. Someone who wants something special, even if it means making some small sacrifices.”
The iPhone Air, priced at $1,000, attempts a new design as a "fashion" or "designer" phone, featuring a 6.5-inch 120Hz display with 3000 nits brightness and an A19 Pro chipset.
However, it is heavily criticized for significant practical shortcomings. The device suffers from predicted poor battery life, a single speaker, and the absence of a vapor chamber cooling system. The camera is also considered less competitive than rivals, particularly regarding the bokeh effect.
Consequently, the reviewer anticipates the iPhone Air will be the most returned device in Apple's history, given these major compromises and its high price point.
“I'm never going to be mad at a company for trying something new and something different. [...] To me, this is like a fashion phone. This is a fashion statement. [...] This is a designer phone. [...] This phone does not have dual speakers. No dual speakers in 2025. This is the new iPhone 16e. And what do I mean by that? This is the new banana head iPhone. [...] I think this is going to be the most returned iPhone in the history of Apple.”
“All right, the battery is not that great. The speaker is not that great. They getting cooked in the phone wars for the camera. You know, I think this phone is going to be going back to Apple quickly.”
The Apple iPhone Air stands out with its very thin design, polished sides, and a robust build, positioning it as potentially the toughest iPhone to date. It boasts the powerful A19 Pro chip, ensuring top-tier performance, and features a unique square sensor in its selfie camera for versatile shots.
However, the phone comes with trade-offs, including a single-lens rear camera system without an ultra-wide option and a real-world battery life of about 10.5 hours, necessitating daily charging. The device can also run warm during demanding tasks, leading the reviewer to acknowledge it as a "risk" despite its expected popularity.
The reviewer plans to adopt the iPhone Air as their main phone, suggesting its compelling design and novelty outweigh its compromises for some users.
“This feels like a risk, doesn't it? My plan is to switch completely from the iPhone 16 to the iPhone Air. This will be my main phone for the next few months, possibly the next year.”
“I think this is going to sell like hotcakes because a lot of people who buy iPhones may not be thinking about those negatives, you know, the battery, durability, camera system.”
“This feels like a risk, doesn't it?”
The Apple iPhone Air incorporates ProMotion display technology, providing a smooth 1-120 Hz refresh rate across its screen. While it recorded the shortest battery life in tests at 6 hours and 43 minutes, it is still deemed sufficient for a full day's use, supported by its efficient C1X modem.
However, the device tends to heat up the fastest during intensive tasks, though this is eventually surpassed by other models. Overall, the iPhone Air offers a decent user experience despite its relative position in battery and initial thermal performance.
“in last place, as we all predicted, really, the iPhone Air. It did pretty well, though. It really wasn't far behind the iPhone 17. It will get you through a full day”
“also help the iPhone Air, which of course uses Apple's new C1X modem, prioritizing efficiency, to last that little bit longer.”
“iPhone Air kicks the bucket. First one to die at 6 hours 43 minutes”
The Apple iPhone Air stands out as the most interesting iPhone in its lineup, primarily due to its extraordinary thinness and stunning, jewelry-like design, making it visually striking and pleasant to hold. It boasts an impressively good-looking display and features significant performance gains from its A19/A19 Pro chip, contributing to a higher rated battery life for video playback.
However, its ultra-thin profile necessitates certain compromises, including the absence of a flagship main camera and an ultrawide lens, and only acceptable real-world battery life performance. Additionally, it sacrifices a GPU core and likely omits advanced cooling solutions found in its larger counterparts.
Despite these trade-offs, the iPhone Air's unique aesthetic makes it a notable and visually appealing device that is sure to attract attention.
“the Air really has been the most interesting iPhone in the lineup to test by far.”
“I just feel like with the liquid glass elements of iOS 26 and the shiny rails, it kind of feels almost like a piece of jewelry, if that makes sense. It's just it's pretty stunning to hold. It's nice to look at,”
“this is the most interesting iPhone of this lineup because of the thin thing and it will get a lot of people checking it out in stores and when they hold a friends and and when they just see it in public just cuz it looks that stunning.”
The Apple iPhone Air suffers from significant performance issues, including being 26% slower than the base iPhone 17 and experiencing severe thermal throttling that limits sustained performance to about a minute. Its single camera struggles with depth perception in portrait mode, and the device features a notably inferior single speaker lacking bass.
Battery life is also a concern, as achieving comparable endurance to other models requires an additional $100 MagSafe battery pack, making the phone considerably thicker. Overall, the phone presents a series of compromises in key areas.
“This thing's peak score was only 3,863. meaning that the iPhone 17, the cheaper phone, which has the nonpro chip, was 26% faster than it.”
“in those challenging scenarios, you can tell that this one camera is preventing it from properly understanding depth.”
“the one on the Air is custom 3D printed in titanium, which is cool. But then you look really closely and you also realize that this port is not actually in the middle of the phone anymore.”
The Apple iPhone Air targets a niche audience prioritizing an exceptionally thin and light design, making it comfortable to hold and easy to pocket. However, this comes with notable trade-offs that may not suit all users.
The camera, while capable in good light, lacks an ultrawide lens and performs less optimally in low light. Battery life is also on the lower end of acceptable, potentially requiring frequent charging, and its high price point demands compromises.
Ultimately, the iPhone Air is a device for those who value form factor and portability above all, rather than a long-lasting or full-featured experience.
“The iPhone Air is not for that person [who wants to hold on to their phone]. I think the battery is going to run down faster. Um, I I think you're just going to run up against the limits of what it can do sooner”
“it's a little bit of a statement. It's sort of for a person who's like, you know what, phones are huge. I don't need all that. I don't like all that. I would just rather exist with a smaller, lighter phone.”
“It is a big phone with small phone energy. It is still like you still have to reach across the screen. It's lighter. It feels nicer in that way. I can fit it in the front pocket of my jeans [...] but it's just it's not a small phone.”
The Apple iPhone Air offers a remarkably thin and light design, making it comfortable to carry and use for extended periods. It boasts a powerful A19 Pro chip, a vibrant 6.5-inch ProMotion screen, and an advanced 48-megapixel rear camera alongside an innovative 18-megapixel selfie camera with unique features.
However, these benefits come with significant trade-offs, primarily a smaller battery that may not last a full day and the absence of a secondary rear camera, which many users might miss. These are highlighted as two hard things to give up for a thinner device.
Ultimately, the iPhone Air is best suited for users who prioritize extreme portability and a sleek form factor over extended battery life and diverse camera capabilities.
“Yes, the Air feels great. Yes, it's easier to carry and nicer to use for longer periods of time.”
“But if you're coming from an iPhone with a second camera and a bigger battery, then you'll know what you're missing out on when you use the iPhone Air. Those are two very hard things to give up”
The iPhone Air impresses with its incredibly thin (5.66mm), light, and unique design, feeling like a futuristic concept phone. Its 6.5-inch "Goldilocks" screen size is a major highlight, offering a perfect balance for use and media consumption, along with premium features like 3,000 nits brightness and 1-120Hz ProMotion. The significantly upgraded 18MP selfie camera also delivers noticeably improved image quality.
Despite these strengths, the phone faces some compromises; it's $200 more than the base iPhone 17, heats up faster under demanding tasks, and lacks the ultrawide and telephoto lenses, as well as pro video features found in other models. However, the reviewer still recommends it for those prioritizing design and a unique Apple experience, noting its overall capability for everyday use and "all-day" battery life.
“Because I really like this thing. I did not go into this expecting to like it as much as I actually do.”
“The point is though, the Air Screen is, for me at least, the perfect size. It's every bit as good as the Pros, and with this design, it's just lovely to use. It genuinely feels like you're holding a concept phone or a future phone. I mean, we're talking 5.66 mm thick.”
“But for a phone this thin, this light, this genuinely very nice to hold and lovely to use, it's impressive and I would recommend it. I would.”
The Apple iPhone Air is distinguished by its exceptionally thin 5.6mm design, offering a large 6.5-inch display that feels even more expansive. It features a durable build with a titanium frame and Ceramic Shield, alongside an innovative 18-megapixel Center Stage selfie camera with advanced video capabilities and dual capture.
However, the phone makes some technical compromises, including a single 48-megapixel rear camera lacking an ultrawide lens, a mono speaker, and the absence of the new high-performance cooling system. Despite these trade-offs, the reviewer considers it a unique and special device, especially with the option to enhance battery capacity significantly, viewing it as a preferable alternative to the discontinued iPhone Plus line.
“This is the iPhone Air. It's a phone whose whole identity revolves around a physical attribute that went out of vogue a long time ago. It's skinny.”
“The Air's frame is grade 5 titanium with Apple's ceramic shield to guard against cracks on the back and second generation ceramic shield protecting the display, which feels even bigger than its 6.5 in diagonal would suggest, thanks to the enclosures 5.6 mm thinness.”
“My own opinion is that I would much sooner buy something special like this than I ever would have considered the device it replaces, the discontinued iPhone Plus line.”
The iPhone Air is presented as a significant technological "science project" for Apple, showcasing extreme thinness at 5.6mm and a remarkably light design that feels distinctively different.
Despite its innovative engineering, the phone comes with notable compromises, including a single camera and concerns about its battery life potentially being a step backward. Priced at $1,000, its fragility due to the thinness is also a concern.
The reviewer anticipates that while many will admire its design, they may ultimately choose a different phone, making the Air more of a foundational device for future Apple products than a mainstream consumer choice.
“it sort of feels like, yeah, why take a step backwards potentially on battery life and camera and still pay a thousand dollars for a phone?”
“it sort of feels like, yeah, why take a step backwards potentially on battery life and camera and still pay a thousand dollars for a phone?”
“I'm like sincerely looking forward to seeing how many people buy the Air because I suspect a lot of people are going to go to an Apple store and look at it and leave with a different phone.”
The Apple iPhone 17 Air stands out with its incredibly thin 5.6mm profile and remarkable durability, featuring Ceramic Shield glass front and back along with an IP68 rating. It offers a premium 6.5-inch ProMotion display and a new, capable 18MP Center Stage selfie camera.
However, the phone makes significant compromises, notably its single rear camera lacking ultrawide and telephoto lenses, and a slightly reduced A19 Pro chip. While battery life is solid for daily use, it is not a highlight, and the device is exclusively eSIM globally.
Priced at $999, its appeal lies in its design and enhanced robustness, but buyers must weigh these advantages against the camera and performance trade-offs. The overall sentiment acknowledges its unique strengths while highlighting its limitations.
“I mean, just look at this thing. Just 5.6 mm thick. It is stunning in the four very nice colors.”
“So, that's the iPhone 17 Air. Is it worth paying $999 for a slightly thinner iPhone? Well, maybe.”
The Apple iPhone 17 Air presents an exceptionally thin 5.6mm profile and a titanium body, offering a visually stunning design. However, this design comes with significant compromises, particularly in battery life due to insufficient internal space.
Despite using an efficient A19 Pro chip, the absence of advanced thermal management raises concerns about overheating and performance throttling under heavy use. At $999, its value proposition is questionable, especially when compared to other iPhones that offer superior overall performance, battery life, and camera systems for a similar or lower price.
“So this thing is a stunningly, ridiculously thin 5.6 millimeters at the thinnest part.”
“So look, I think there's two ways to look at this phone.”
“it's the worst one.”
The iPhone Air is characterized by several significant limitations, such as the presence of only a single lens and the probable lack of stereo speakers, which may affect the user experience. The reviewer also expresses strong skepticism regarding the battery life and overall performance of this model, which is a considerable drawback.
Additionally, the device will not offer a physical SIM tray, relying solely on eSIM technology. Despite these shortcomings, this model, despite the price increase, offers increased base storage of 256 GB and is also equipped with Ceramic Shield 2 coating, which is intended to improve scratch resistance.
“iPhone R, which is a device with a thickness of 5.6, 6 mm with a single lens, most likely with a single speaker, namely the lack of stereo e-SIM. There will be no possibility of removing a physical SIM tray. And they focused a bit on the battery of the iPhone R. However, I doubt that the battery in this device will be good and can last as long as possible.”
The iPhone 17 Air is presented as a device mainly for showing off, characterized by its thin body and resistance to scratches on both the front and back. The reviewer questions its practical benefits, suggesting it offers no significant improvements over the standard iPhone 17.
Concerns arise regarding battery life, despite manufacturer assurances, further highlighted by the design of a dedicated power bank. The camera features an innovative single 'Fusion' lens, but its overall utility and value are questioned.
Instead of the Air model, users valuing functionality and practicality are recommended to choose the standard iPhone 17, which offers similar performance without the added, unjustified value.
“The iPhone 17 Air is typically a device for showing off. Look, I have such a thin iPhone, look how thin it is, and it's also resistant to scratches, both front and back, because they covered it with a special layer on the front and back.”
“This phone is for showing off. It's like a 100% action: 'Look what I bought.' If you want a phone that works the same as this one, just get the standard 17. Not the Air.”
“this phone absolutely creates an impression. Like the first time I picked the thing up, my mouth involuntarily formed a silent O as I truly came to terms with how at 5.6 mm, this is thinner than any previous iPhone”
“you're making two pretty fundamental compromises for this thinness. The battery, which Apple helpfully tells us is still an all day battery, but whose day?”
“My take is that the weight and the thickness of a normal phone is it's not enough of a problem to need this drastic of a solution.”
The iPhone 17 Air raises concerns for the reviewer primarily regarding its screen and battery. The small battery capacity would necessitate a variable refresh rate screen, which it might lack.
The implementation of a fixed 120Hz instead of ProMotion technology is viewed as a significant flaw, and the absence of ProMotion also means foregoing the Always On Display feature. Considering the device's price, the reviewer deems the screen-related decisions as a 'shot in the knee' for Apple.
“in the case of the ERA [iPhone 17 Air], a screen with a variable refresh rate from 1 to 120 Hz is necessary to relieve the relatively small battery in any way.”
“in the case of the ERA [iPhone 17 Air], I personally think it's a shot in the knee.”
“if there was no ProMotion screen, it would also translate into the lack of Apple's Always On Display.”
The reviewer strongly criticizes the iPhone 17 Air, highlighting that its extremely thin design leads to a very weak battery that will not last most users a full day. Apple anticipates that only 60-70% of users will be satisfied with the battery life, a much worse result than in previous models.
The company suggests purchasing an additional, expensive battery case to solve this problem. This solution is deemed nonsensical and absurd, especially since the price of the cut-down phone is comparable to full-fledged models. The overall conclusion is that manufacturers, including Apple, are prioritizing design over functionality, which the reviewer finds unacceptable.
“You understand this nonsense is the problem itself, in the sense of a thin device with a weak battery, and they are offering a solution for an additional fee.”
“For me, it's utter stupidity to offer something like this to people.”
“This year, manufacturers will inundate us, and they will base their marketing slogan on the thinness of the device, meaning design over functionality.”